Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are the ones associated with the authors and don’t necessarily reflect the views of LawTeacher.
1. Explain community-policing. List the benefits and disadvantages of community policing. Detail the two most points that are important police agencies in utilizing this perspective.
Community Policing brings police and citizens together to prevent crime and solve neighborhood problems. The emphasis is on stopping crime before it happens, not responding to calls for service after the crime occurs with community policing. Community policing gives citizens more control over the quality of life in their community. Community policing means police become part of the neighborhood. It will help police get a far better sense of resident’s needs and assists residents to produce greater trust in the police. In essence the community joins law enforcement department. Those “who think that community policing is practiced in their neighborhood are more likely to express favorable opinions for the police.”(Weitzer & Tuch, 2006, p. 45) Together, in partnership, the city and police department come together to realize a common goal of a safer, better spot to live. It really is “democracy for action.”(BJA, August 1994, p. 4).
Community policing is seen as an effective option to promote public safety and also to improve the total well being in a residential area. Community policing plays a pivotal role in the two defining components of policing: police-community relations and problem-solving. “First, it must broaden police organization goals …Second, it should alter the way police are organized to perform their goals.” (Weisburd & Braga, 2007, p. 47) Active participation is necessary from the local government to the average citizen to ensure that community policing to exert effort. Everybody is responsible for safeguarding the welfare of the neighborhood. The goals of policing are expanded and the perception of community is changed unlike traditional policing methods. Traditional policing assumes that the nagging problems of society are not in the world of law enforcement department. Traditional police departments are strictly reactive and look that is don’t efficiently resolving the immediate incident in front of you. Police officers are linked with the dispatcher and rarely have time to complete a lot more than answer one call after another. The police department, as a business, separates itself through the populous city’s infrastructure and from city services.
Implementing community policing changes the dwelling of policing and exactly how it really is managed. Community policing helps build up and strengthen the community. It links law enforcement as well as the grouped community together. The partnership that develops over time can ultimately assist the police get the underlying causes of crime within the neighborhood. By getting the grouped community involved, the police have significantly more resources available for them to greatly help in crime prevention. By familiarizing themselves utilizing the people in the city, officers are more inclined to obtain valuable information about criminals and their activities. Also they are more prone to obtain a reliable evaluation of the needs of citizens and their expectations associated with the police.
As previously stated, community policing plays a major part in police-community relations and problem-solving. So that you can develop a partnership using the community, first the authorities must form a great relationship with a nearby. The authorities must attempt to involve the neighborhood in its pursuit to regulate crime. Most community concerns and solutions are identified through problem-solving. The objective would be to to minimize crime and disorder by diligently examining the attributes of concerns in communities after which applying the best suited problem-solving solutions.
With any method of policing there are going to be advantages and disadvantages. One of several advantages that are main community policing is the fact that it reduces fear in the neighborhood. The residents feel more secure with an increase in police presence in the neighborhood. This feeling of security helps the authorities establish trust inside the community. As citizen be more active in caring for their community, they begin to determine what officers really do on a basis that is day-to-day. This improves police-community relations. Ultimately, quality of life for the grouped community improves and crime is reduced. Another advantage is the fact pay someone to write my paper that grouped community policing is flexible and effective at changing. The solutions and strategies change as the community changes. If an idea works within one community it does mean that it n’t will be able to work in all communities. Community policing allows the city to create solutions that will work of their neighborhood that is own and change or eliminate those who try not to work. Community policing could be implemented in a limitless number of ways. This is especially true of problem-solving. They both are just limited by one’s imagination. Community policing offers an array of benefits. Making use that is effective of talents and resources available within communities will help extend severely strained police resources. Also, reduced levels of crime will allow more police resources to be allocated to services that have the impact that is greatest in the quality of community life.
A disadvantage that is major that the only way that community policing is with community involvement.
There should be an existing partnership amongst the police officers therefore the community. Without the trust and involvement for the community, any attempts at community policing will fail. “Police and there would-be partners do not always value the same, and sometimes even compatible, things” (Thacher, 2001, p. 766). Effective community policing requires a commitment that is long-term everyone involved. It’s not a quick fix. Ongoing relationships must be maintained and established. Another disadvantage to community policing is ensuring that the right people are heading within the project. The focus should be of enhancing the community and not using the program to advance their very own career that is personal agendas. Also, programs like community policing could be regressive. Oftentimes if you have an issue that requires help from the city it seem like the same people always step of progress. They are usually the homeowners that have longstanding ties to your community. Community policing requires everyone’s involvement, not just the homeowners.
“Over a decade after it had been first introduced, community policing remains the most important innovation in American policing today.” (Forman, Autumn 2002, p. 1) some great benefits of implementing community policing still outweigh the disadvantages. Getting the community on the website side can only just benefit law enforcement inside their aid to manage and stop crime. Also, aided by the police more involved in the day to day activities regarding the community will assist in the revitalization associated with community. This will probably only happen if both law enforcement and also the community are able to place in enough time, effort, and patience that is required when implementing the community program that is policing.